<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Aesthetic Confrontation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/an-aesthetic-confrontation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/an-aesthetic-confrontation/</link>
	<description>Musings on interaction design and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 02:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/an-aesthetic-confrontation/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/?p=910#comment-4032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A question: you suggest that: 
&quot;At the end of the day, we are successful if we have helped designers make interactions that are more aesthetic, not if we win academic turf wars.&quot;
But judging from your case studies it would seem that designers are already producing aesthetic interactions. Isn&#039;t the goal for HCI theory to catch up with &quot;in the wild&quot; practice? Or to make explicit what is implicit within practice so as to better support future developments? (OK, that&#039;s two questions)
I guess I&#039;m struggling with the sense that HCI still behaves as if it leads/owns the production of computer technology whereas the evidence would suggest that democratisation has seen tech production (particularly software) appropriated by practitioners from diverse fields - fields without the baggage of HCI, and which have no need for articles with titles like: “What is beautiful is usable” and “Attractive things work better” (cringe)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question: you suggest that:<br />
&#8220;At the end of the day, we are successful if we have helped designers make interactions that are more aesthetic, not if we win academic turf wars.&#8221;<br />
But judging from your case studies it would seem that designers are already producing aesthetic interactions. Isn&#8217;t the goal for HCI theory to catch up with &#8220;in the wild&#8221; practice? Or to make explicit what is implicit within practice so as to better support future developments? (OK, that&#8217;s two questions)<br />
I guess I&#8217;m struggling with the sense that HCI still behaves as if it leads/owns the production of computer technology whereas the evidence would suggest that democratisation has seen tech production (particularly software) appropriated by practitioners from diverse fields &#8211; fields without the baggage of HCI, and which have no need for articles with titles like: “What is beautiful is usable” and “Attractive things work better” (cringe)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/an-aesthetic-confrontation/#comment-4031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactionculture.wordpress.com/?p=910#comment-4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s alarming that the “Visual Aesthetics in HCI and Interaction Design&quot; entry is such a HCI cliche, but it&#039;s admirable that the HCI field permits the kind of public discourse that you have engaged in.

I really enjoyed your commentary. I hope that it&#039;s the foundation of a future book :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s alarming that the “Visual Aesthetics in HCI and Interaction Design&#8221; entry is such a HCI cliche, but it&#8217;s admirable that the HCI field permits the kind of public discourse that you have engaged in.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed your commentary. I hope that it&#8217;s the foundation of a future book <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
