Some Questions about Activity Theory and “Limits”

So… Dourish claims that “… if our technical practice is built on those foundations, then the arguments are deeply relevant, because they determine the limits of what can be done and the chances for success of our efforts to have people and computers work effectively together.” In other words, if HCI is rooted in a philosophical foundation, will those “limits” and parameters be better defined and lead to a better outcome.? As I read it, “limits” can be (at least mostly) positive as Dourish describes them. So why then, in Activity Theory would we want to “overcome” the limits by adjusting philosophical foundations?

Is the mediation by tools a limit? The community? Division of labor?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Activity Theory. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s